Our Golden Age Index 2018 shows that the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) is gradually improving towards a greater engagement of older individuals in the workforce. Weighing an average of seven indicators that reflect the labour market for workers over 55 years, the Index shows that countries like Iceland, New Zealand, Israel, Estonia and Sweden have successfully closed the age-gap in the work population and benefit from a positive, long-term impact in their economies. As they raise the bar in employing an older workforce, other members of the OECD work to catch up to these countries, including Luxembourg, which occupies the 34th place. What drives the employment of an older workforce across the OECD? What main challenges does an older workforce face? What is the situation of older workers in Luxembourg? We answer these questions in this article.
The economic potential of retaining an older workforce
Our Golden Age Index takes a holistic view of the labour market for older workers across the OECD. By considering a broad range of indicators (employment rate, gender gap in employment, full time earnings, among others), we explored in detail the economic prospects of older workers over 35 OECD countries over time.
According to our study, Iceland, New Zealand and Israel continue to occupy the top places, followed closely by Israel and Estonia. On the other side of the coin in Southern Europe, Turkey, Greece and Italy had the lowest performance on the Index.
In the long-term, increasing the employment of an older workforce may boost the OECD’s GDP by $3.5 trillion. If countries raise their employment rates and facilitate access of 55+ year old workers to the labour market, the OECD would match current New Zealand employment levels. Even though countries like Italy and France have the potential for long-run increases of GDP, countries that scored lower in the Golden Age Index have the most to gain in the long-run from increasing their employment rates. In this case, Greece could take the lead but experiencing the largest GDP increase of around 23%.
Automation poses both potential opportunities and challenges for older workers. AI technology can boost economic growth, generate more labour demand and support longer working lives (e.g. through use of digital platforms that allow older workers to market their skills more widely). However, it could also require some older workers to retrain for adapting to new careers later in life, as well as to acquire additional digital skills when performing the current ones.
Factors driving higher employment rate of older workers across the OECD
There is a large variation in the employment rates of older workers in OECD countries, going from 30% to 40% in many Southern European countries to over 60% in Nordic countries. As we showed before, higher GDP is one of the rewards gained by countries investing in the employment of an older workforce.
Several structural and policy factors explain the different employment rates among older workers:
- Life Expectancy: This is a positive fact that has a major impact on employment: the longer people live, the longer they work. This factor also includes health standards, impacted by health care policies and medical developments. Health influences the age workers retire.
- Public pension expenditure as a share of GDP: greater expenditure is expected to reduce the incentive for older workers to stay active.
- Public expenditure on family benefits as a share of GDP: it usually includes direct cash benefits and benefits in kind for childcare. This may explain a longer active professional life as greater financial benefits for families can lower the financial burden.
- Annual average wage growth: This factor has an ambiguous impact on retaining an older workforce. On one hand, higher wages should encourage greater participation levels of older workers. On the other, they can be associated with higher unemployment of older workers. It’s often easier for them to find a source of alternative income than a paid employment, such as a pension or disability benefits. In addition, when employers’ payroll taxes related to age and wage are progressive, older employees are more costly. It commonly translates into a greater incentive for employers to offer early retirement packages.
- Marital status: Marriage may have a significant impact on employment at an older age. As spouses assume greater responsibilities to take care of their partners, their availability for full-time jobs decreases.This, combined with the common family income, can decrease the financial incentive to work longer.
- Gender participation gap: Lowering the barriers that prevent women from participating in the labour force is likely to improve the employment rate overall. The gender participation gap is an indicator of setbacks from both the structural and policy factors in women’s professional lives. If the government gives incentives to women in the beginning of their parental lives, the time they spend in the labour market might increase.
- Employment protection for temporary contracts: Employment protection laws and age discrimination laws may be mixed and have an opposite effect. Higher employment protection levels for temporary contracts have negatively affected the employment rate of older workers. The employer may associate the extra employment protection with extra financial costs when hiring older workers.
Source: PwC Luxembourg
Publié le 02 juillet 2018